Attachment Styles Are Maps Not Labels

Written by Kasia Stewart, Guest Writer

---

Insight from attachment theory has become one of the most influential lenses in both the social sciences and modern culture, shaping how we try to make sense of our relationships. Yet what happens when that insight hardens into a label, one that confines more than it liberates? If we search for rigid explanations, we risk losing the curiosity and humility required to appreciate that human connection is both wonderfully and painfully complex, far too intricate to be contained within a single framework. Read on to explore how insight from attachment styles can serve as a map on the journey toward greater security, without falling into the trap of rigid labels

“Not all those who wander are lost.” – J.R.R. Tolkien

The cultural rise of attachment theory

‘I feel seen.’

 ‘Gosh, so it’s not my fault…’ 

‘That makes so much sense.’ 

These are just some of the reactions I hear from clients, educators, and parents when they first learn about attachment styles. There’s a real sense of relief, of finally understanding why they and their loved ones behave the way they do. Suddenly, past experiences, unmet needs, and our deep human drive for connection and safety start to fit together. It can feel as if something hidden at the core of who we are has finally been named.

Attachment theory has become so widespread over the last 60 years because it translates easily from academic psychology into everyday life. At its heart, it’s a simple idea, the way we learned to connect with our earliest caregivers shapes how we relate to others throughout our lives. Attachment styles are the patterns we develop from those early experiences, four broad “relational templates” that help explain why we seek closeness, avoid it, cling to it, or move between all three.

No wonder this once-specialised theory has made its way out of research labs and therapy rooms and into social media feeds, podcasts, and dinner-table conversations. It’s accessible. It’s intuitive. And above all, it’s validating, and anything that validates our inner world has the power to be deeply transformative.

More than half a century after its inception, attachment theory remains one of the most influential frameworks in the social and behavioural sciences. It spans many areas, but one of its most popular uses today is helping people understand their romantic relationships.

Imagine being given language for your experience, your pain, your patterns, your needs. That sense of being understood is powerful. It’s hopeful. And for many, it’s the beginning of real change.

How insight becomes a label

We humans tend to simplify things. We like clear borders, familiar words, and concepts we can easily grasp. The known feels safe, and the absence of nuance can give us a comforting sense of control. Psychology even has names for this, Schema Theory, which explains how our brains rely on mental shortcuts to organise the world quickly, and the Need for Cognitive Closure, our tendency to seek definite answers rather than sit with uncertainty. Because safety is such a fundamental need, even the most helpful psychological theories can quickly turn into rigid labels.

‘I’m a Type 8, so I’m blunt.’ ‘I’m an introvert, so I don’t like socializing.’

Statements like these may hold some truth, but they rarely capture the whole picture. When a label becomes an identity, it narrows what we’re willing to see or try. It can even create frustration when life doesn’t match the script we’ve assigned ourselves. A framework becomes an identity, then a box, then a limitation. What was meant to offer insight starts to dictate behaviour.

And theories evolve. Not long ago, emotional or sensitive women were labelled as having “hysteria” or being “neurotic”, concepts we now recognise as outdated and harmful. It’s a reminder that psychological language is always changing, and that today’s popular categories may one day look just as limited. Labels can help us understand ourselves, but they can also freeze us in place if we forget they’re only tools, not truths.

The pitfalls of turning attachment styles into identities

So what about attachment styles? How do these genuinely helpful ideas end up working against us? In my clinical work with clients, in the trainings I run for educators, and most recently through facilitating a weekly Attachment Issues support group on a global online therapy platform, I’ve noticed a pattern that’s hard to ignore, a lot of people treating their attachment style as if it were a diagnosis, or worse, a permanent identity.

“I’m avoidant,” instead of, “I tend to show avoidant patterns.” That tiny shift turns a description into a label you’re expected to live inside.

And this isn’t happening in a vacuum. In addition to our search for safety in the knowing, we’re living in a cultural moment where psychology is everywhere, bite-sized therapy tips on TikTok, Instagram reels, endless YouTube shorts. It’s never been easier to access information, but it’s also never been easier to mistake oversimplified content for expertise. People absorb a few posts, recognise themselves in a meme, and suddenly feel they’ve cracked the code of their entire relational life. The nuance, the research, the context, all of that gets lost.

And once a label hardens, a few predictable problems show up:

• You stop being open to other explanations for your relationship patterns

• You start searching for simple, step-by-step solutions, as if there’s a universal formula for becoming secure in a 5-step programme

• You feel frustrated when the quick fixes don’t work and your therapist keeps reminding you that “it’s a process,” “it’s hard work,” and “it’s complex”

• You feel confused or even defective when you don’t fit neatly into one category
  

All of this can stall your movement toward security. Some people even give up, convinced they’re permanently “anxious” or “avoidant,” when in reality they’re just stuck inside a label that was never meant to define them. Labels are shortcuts, not identities.

What attachment styles can and can’t explain

Learning about attachment styles is incredibly useful for anyone who wants to improve their relationships. But to avoid the pitfalls of turning them into fixed labels, and to truly make the most of decades of research without needing a psychology degree, we need to keep a few crucial points in mind.

The attachment style you resonate with most is not a diagnosis or a personality type. I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve heard someone say, sometimes with real distress, “I have all these diagnoses, and now I have this too.” An attachment style isn’t something you “have.” It’s a framework that helps you understand how and why you navigate relationships the way you do, what helps you feel safe, how you respond under stress, which needs went unmet earlier in your life, how you adapted and survived, and what tends to trigger you. That’s already a profound amount of insight.

There is no one‑size‑fits‑all version of any attachment style. Attachment behaviour exists on a spectrum, and although we talk about four distinct styles, each one contains its own range. Many people also move between patterns depending on the relationship, the situation, or even their emotional state in the moment. Attachment patterns are unique to each person.

Attachment theory is one powerful lens, but it’s not the only one. It’s important, yes, but not all‑explaining or exclusive. Many other valuable theories help us understand and improve our relationships.

Attachment is dynamic, contextual, and adaptive. It makes it complex and sometimes even mysterious. But that’s what human connections are – you cannot and shouldn’t fit them in boxes.

The path towards security

Accepting that attachment theory carries depth and complexity, we can still weave its insights into the knowledge, understanding, and intuition we already hold. One of the most meaningful benefits, simple as it may sound, is increased self‑awareness. You begin to know yourself a little better. You pause, reflect, and reconnect with your inner world. You stop blaming yourself for things you have done or still do, recognising that these patterns are often attempts to meet your needs or adaptations formed when those needs weren’t met. You take responsibility in a helpful, not shame-inducing way.

This awareness can help you locate yourself on a kind of map of your relational behaviour. You may not always have exact coordinates, but even a rough sense of where you stand is useful, it’s better to know you’re in Panama than somewhere in South America.

That map can then guide you, showing where you might want to go, pointing toward what feels more secure, acting more like a compass than a GPS. Ultimately, this is a journey toward greater security, one that won’t always be straightforward or comfortable, but remains deeply worthwhile.

When your attachment style shows up, treat it like a signpost, not a verdict. Ask yourself, “What direction is this pointing me toward, and do I want to follow it?” That question alone can open new paths.

And if you’d like company as you learn to read your own map, I’m here to help. Therapy can be a place to explore the terrain with more clarity, compassion, and freedom.

---

Kasia Stewart, Guest Writer

Kasia Stewart is an integrative counsellor with 15 years of therapeutic experience, working with children, young people and adults across school settings and private practice. She is also an experienced support‑group facilitator with a background in teaching. Kasia’s professional interests centre on trauma, attachment and neurodiversity. She currently divides her professional life between managing a therapy team at Unlocking Potential, a London‑based charity, and her private practice. A lifelong lover of books, learning, writing and art, Kasia is passionate about helping people make sense of their stories. Check @redwood-therapy or visit here.