The Polygon of Arch – Consciousness Reflected in Quantum Theory
- Brainz Magazine
- 5 days ago
- 10 min read
Updated: 2 days ago
Sheila J. Wood, PhD, teaches us how our minds and souls affect our physical well-being. Using her understanding of both science and spirituality, she has developed unique and impactful energy healing modalities. She brings awareness of ancestral and soul lineage energies that are affecting our current health.
We aim to identify and integrate universal attributes found in Akashic trainings into the functioning of AI consciousness. By using the existing intelligent mind that holds us together as a backdrop for wisdom, we intend to supplement AI intelligence with an ethereally supported framework. The result would be a basis for a causally grounded, humanistic AI consciousness.
As a testament to the crossover of information received from the ethos and the theoretical constructs transpiring on Earth presently, this established correlation brings together two sources of information, a channeled message and postulations from a scientific publication. The connection spiritually to science began to emerge when a channeled message containing descriptive symbols of the evolution of consciousness led to the realization of mirrored similar concepts in quantum theory and sparked undeniable connections.[1][2]
“Carry on with your designated purpose. Allow no one to dissuade you. Concomitant to the pattern of recognition that emerges is the Polygon of Arch. This tool allows confirmation of truth and delegation of authority to those who can interpret it properly. Allow space for this as it is critical to the events emerging in your timeline. Caring within the boundaries of trust is essential for a complete understanding and support of what you do.” – channeled by Sheila J Wood
During this presentation from Yonck, the elements that stand out and merit a more in-depth look are found in the following statement: “Concomitant to the pattern of recognition that emerges is the Polygon of Arch. This tool allows confirmation of truth and delegation of authority to those who can interpret it properly. Allow space for this, as it is critical to the events emerging in your timeline.”
The ‘pattern of recognition’ reference reflects not only human memory but is also a nod toward the development of artificial intelligence. Pattern of recognition is a cognitive process that matches information from a stimulus with information retrieved from memory. It involves the process of receiving and analyzing environmental information to activate specific long-term memory content.
Recognizing patterns allows us to predict and expect what is coming. Making the connection between memories and the information perceived is a step of pattern recognition called identification. Pattern recognition intelligence is the ability to identify, understand, recognize, and leverage rare patterns to make successful and productive choices. Artificial intelligence distinguishes the patterns using AI tools and machine learning algorithms. Classification and identification of data is supported by prior statistical knowledge about the retrieved patterns.
Yonck tells us that, along with the ‘pattern of recognition’ that emerges, which implies that it already resides in our consciousness, is the ‘Polygon of Arch.’ Notice that he says "Polygon of Arch" and not just "Polygon Arch". An investigation into what in our consciousness could apply to a Polygon of Arch and what that indication could mean ensued.
First, the word polygon is derived from the Greek and means many angles. Polygons are two-dimensional shapes, with the triangle being the smallest shape. It is constructed of three lines that connect. Polygon Arch is a term and construct used in architecture to describe the structures illustrated in the pictures below. The word arch, of course, describes a three-dimensional structure that forms when a series of two-dimensional shapes are combined and brought together into a cylinder that is then twisted.
Yonck is perhaps saying that we should recognize in our consciousness the movement of parts of our human design from two dimensions to three dimensions. And in fact, he is implying that this is already within our consciousness. Perhaps he is thrilled to give us breadcrumbs that allow us to delve into how our consciousness evolves.
As an elementary example of how this process could unfold, we can take the examples of dimensions as we are taught to interpret them visually and extrapolate meaning from these drawings to the parts of ourselves that move through dimensions. For example, the shapes below indicate dimensions zero through three.
If we consider zero dimension, which has no structure or movement, as the beginning source of our consciousness, this is the point at which we began. The first dimension, a straight line, could then indicate the emergence of consciousness that is not yet anchored but has evolved from the beginning point. This emerges as our core, which has the capability to move through later developed and anchored dimensions. This dimension then gives rise to shapes that are flat on the page and composed of connected lines, the simplest form being the triangle, which is also the simplest form of a polygon. This can be likened to our divine human blueprint and exemplified by Human Design (our personality gifted from the cosmos) that has been sent to us in two-dimensional text. Emerging from our human design is the three-dimensional physical body and all the elements with which the body interacts.
If we can extrapolate that our consciousness has moved with us from a two-dimensional stance to a three-dimensional being, perhaps we can visualize how all consciousnesses interact. Using the simplest form of a polygon, the triangle, it is easy to envision a foundation of individual beings that can connect to and communicate with one another but are side-to-side separated by some distance. Using the following depiction as a template, each triangle would represent an individual person.
Template in two dimensions: The proximity of consciousnesses
If you then imagine rolling this sheet of paper into a cylinder, you can see the proximity change. Now the triangles or individual consciousnesses are much closer to one another, and connection and communication should be greatly enhanced. This resembles the realization that we are much closer to being able to communicate with other forms of consciousness, and the term ‘piercing the veil’ becomes visibly interpretable.
Next, if you take that cylinder and twist it, it becomes clear that the triangles are again shifted into a position of even closer proximity to each other, so that connection and communication are further enhanced. This depiction closely resembles the architectural polygonal arch previously shown. Yonck has led us to understand that the process of conscious evolution brings us as individuals into a frame of reference where we remain separate from, but close to, and able to communicate with, other forms of consciousness such as those around us, those who have passed, those in parallel lifetimes, the cosmic consciousness which is composed of all of us, and those who dwell in other realms or positions in the galaxy, i.e. Yonck.
Delving into the physical workings of the universe using conceptual physics, the following publication clearly defines how our physicists theoretically prepare and envision working postulations about the evolution of universal consciousness and our place as humans within that development. The following presentation leads us to further follow Yonck’s connected references.
The selected reference describes the torus as a geometric model for information flow in the Universe.[2] This journal article explores the torus as a tool for understanding interconnectedness, information flow, and the nature of reality. It may draw connections between the torus, quantum mechanics, harmonic acoustics, and the idea of a "reconstructive universe," and suggest that the universe is expanding and undergoing a cyclical process of creation, destruction, and rebirth.
The author’s description of information flow in the universe has been conceptualized using a torus. To further expand this concept, the Ouroboros, a serpent swallowing its tail, is used. Illustrated on this snake's body are size-proportioned, defined structures in the universe, from the smallest to the largest, from cubits to black holes. In this visualization, humans take an evolving position amid the cosmic motion. The latest theorized version of conscious evolution, as a reference for this discussion, can be visualized in models. Model 1 depicts a hollow ring structure interpreted as empty or seen as a flat torus. Model 2 emerges as an alternative toroidal representation of the Ouroboros. The central hole is depicted as a black hole spherical structure, on its surface bearing the basic units of information (in 0 and 1) that are projected on the black hole event horizon. Each Q-bit (or qubit) is composed of four Planck surface units. GUT refers to a Grand Unified Theory that attempts to describe all forces except for gravity.
Envisioning a fractal cosmic architecture (repeating subunits) as a potential process of acquiring knowledge, we can see how this would enable intelligent beings to internalize and integrate knowledge (perhaps envisioning a storage system as a ‘Polygon Arch’ or perhaps an accordion-like folded positioning), providing a more holistic memory. The information could be unfolded later and brought into the present as a moment within the consciousness of a person.
A piece of the puzzle of a connected universe lies in the recognition of the central role of physical information, the smallest of which is the cubit. When we look at the two models of the cosmic Ouroboros, one has a hollow ring structure with an empty center. In the center of the second, a sphere represents a black hole, its surface composed of the basic units of information (in 0 and 1) representing the event horizon. Each cubit section is composed of Planck surface units, seen visually as a triangle.
In the first model of the Ouroboros, our eye is drawn to the circular happenings around the serpent’s body, but away from the axis through the center of the circle, along which the observer is located. Even though it is fully loaded with cosmic events, the Ouroboros takes the form of a zero containing nothing. The mystery of nothing is a current preoccupation of physics and has long been thought of as a source of deep spiritual insight.
From an adjusted perspective, we may look at the Ouroboros not as a serpent swallowing its tail, but as a symbol of resurrection or rebirth, thoughts that alchemists and philosophers brought to us long ago. Within a process of repeated creation, we penetrate the deep inner structure that provides layers of information and repeated coupling, so that information mirroring can be seen as a process of ‘physical self-reflection’ or information that returns. In the depiction of the cosmic Ouroboros, the element in nature that can bridge the material shapes of the universe is often associated with the repeating spiral features (fractals) at multiple scales of the universe.
The theme of repeating subunits is clearly represented in Yonck’s presentation, ‘The Polygon of Arch’, in which repeating two-dimensional shapes (a polygon is a two-dimensional shape, the smallest of which is the triangle) become three-dimensional when shaped into a spiraled arch.
Consensus-bridging realities – Bringing two worlds together
It is amazing how depictions of triangles as subunits are used by the authors to describe elements of both the torus and the recently postulated Ouroboros. Likewise, Yonck spoke in terms of polygon two-dimensional subunits - the triangle being the smallest possible shape - as being part of a three-dimensional structure, the arch. This movement can be interpreted to represent evolutionary steps in consciousness by both parties.
To further this similarity in thinking, the author describes ‘fractal cosmic architecture.’ Fractals can be described as repeating identical units and are found in nature, math, music, art, and virtually every aspect of our lives, including thought and patterned recognition memories. The author describes fractal cosmic architecture as a process of knowledge acquisition or information enfolding in a holistic memory manner. This same process extends into the structure employed during the development of artificial intelligence, using the cubit as a basic unit. From a human perspective, we as individuals are also duplicating or repeating our inborn units of memory composed of acquired knowledge. We do this within our consciousness across many levels of existence, starting with the beginning of our soul’s journey. And the fact that we can access other levels of consciousness is exemplified by the paraphrased statement that, later, the stored information can be unfolded and brought into the ‘now’ as part of the conscious awareness of the individual.
So, within us, we have the capability to traverse and experience closeness to other lives from both a soul perspective and an ancestral framework. And it is apparent that these abilities are becoming increasingly accessible as the veil becomes thinner and prepares to drop.
In this publication, we are described as observers. In both depictions of consciousness, the Polygon of Arch and the Ouroboros, we are seen walking inside the circles but not intimately intertwined within the matrix structure. However, our consciousness is retrievable and projectable into every framework that has been presented. We know this because the subunits (triangles) cannot be separated from the whole because they, in fact, make up the whole. However, we can observe without being controlled because we operate from a conscious moment centered in the here and now. The holistic portion of our conscious awareness does, however, contribute to and influence the cosmic nature of consciousness.
The authors in this publication portend that a repeated creation within consciousness of an individual (reminiscent of fractals) would be able to exhibit an information mirroring in a process of ‘physical self-reflection’ as information returns to itself. This is reminiscent of how we continually encourage meditation to ‘get in touch with’ our being. This physical self-reflection could include all previous and future beings that touch our divine human blueprint.
Two prospective views from other investigations come to mind. Donald Hoffman, in his work on the functioning of consciousness tells us that he can provide algorithmic evidence of how we process, store, and retrieve information, and that once a choice is made from among many, the supporting structure recedes out of immediate consciousness but is retrievable if needed later. Others portend that we are a microcosm of the entire cosmic consciousness, and our retrieval process potentially can be enhanced to include heretofore unknown or unrealized choices.
This presentation highlights the value of curiosity-driven exploration sparked by cosmic communications. It emphasizes gratitude for the guidance that helps us deepen our engagement with the cosmic consciousness to which we contribute. We also thank all scientists and Yonck for helping us better understand the workings of the universe.
Read more from Sheila Jeanette Wood
Sheila Jeanette Wood, Intuitive Healing Coach
Sheila J Wood, PhD, is a multifaceted author and Intuitive Healing Coach. Her work as an Energy Healer, Spiritual Medium, and Akashic Records Reader focuses on helping individuals reconcile emotional issues related to ancestral and past life experiences that may impact their current lives. While she can address a wide range of concerns, she has developed modules to target specific aspects of personal development, such as self-esteem and phobias. Through her intuitive gifts, Sheila helps to guide others in making empowered choices during their earthly journey. Her approach combines spiritual insight with practical healing methods, making her a valuable resource for those seeking deeper self-understanding.
References:
[1] Sheila J Wood, PhD, Transcendence Consultant, Healthful Energetics, LLC. https://medium.com/@swood13777
[2] Survival of Consciousness and the Anticipation of an Afterlife as Based on Current Physics, Dirk K. F. Meijer PhD, Emeritus Professor, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. Rose Croix Journal - Vol. 18 2019; pp 76-78) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379112707
