Look in the Direction of Time
- Brainz Magazine
- 20 hours ago
- 4 min read
Brian R. Yurachek is a former 'Wall Street' asset manager and founder of Parallel Worlds, Inc., where he develops IoT-driven media platforms that connect physical environments with digital assets for next-generation user experiences.
In "Look in the Direction of Time," Brian R. Yurachek challenges the conventional understanding of time, presenting it not as a ticking clock but as the unfolding sequence of change. Through the lens of technology and culture, Yurachek explores the profound importance of ordering events, not just marking their time, and how this process builds trust and continuity. He demonstrates how decentralized systems preserve the integrity of history, transforming cultural assets into living, evolving narratives that remain coherent and verifiable over time.
Time is not a clock. It is an ordering of change
Most of us think about time as something we can point to, a clock on a wall, a date on a document, a timestamp in a system. These tools are useful, but they often lead us to a false conclusion, that time exists on its own, moving forward whether anything happens or not.
In reality, time only becomes meaningful when something changes. If nothing moves, nothing interacts, nothing evolves, there is no real sense of before or after. What we call time is simply how we describe the relationship between events as they unfold.
Why order comes before time
What gives time its structure is sequence. One event happens, then another follows. Once that sequence is established and cannot be reversed, time takes on meaning. Cause leads to effect. History begins to form.
In the physical world, this shows up as irreversibility, things age, materials wear down, energy disperses. Even if small processes can be undone, the overall direction is forward. We experience this as the arrow of time.
A decentralized blockchain works in a similar way. It only moves forward when something changes. Each new block represents a confirmed update to the system. Events are not just stored, they are placed in a shared order that everyone can independently verify. Once that order is agreed upon, it becomes part of the system’s history.
Why sequence builds trust
This is why sequence matters more than exact timing. Knowing the precise second something was recorded is often less important than knowing what came before and what came after. Timestamps help coordinate with the real world, but they are not the foundation of trust.
The foundation is ordering. This becomes especially important when records are disputed. A traditional database can store detailed timestamps, but it can also be altered, reorganized, or selectively edited. When ordering is enforced through decentralized agreement, changing the past becomes difficult and visible. Trust comes from the fact that everyone sees the same sequence.
Memory, not just data
Most systems are designed to store information. Far fewer are designed to preserve memory. Memory requires continuity. It requires that events remain connected to one another in a way that makes sense over time. When records lose their order, they lose their meaning. Context collapses. History becomes negotiable.
A system that preserves sequence does more than store facts. It protects relationships between facts. That distinction is subtle but critical. It is the difference between a list of claims and a coherent history.
Culture as a living record
These ideas matter well beyond technology. Cultural assets depend on continuity. Artworks, artifacts, and collections gain meaning through their histories, who created a work, where it has been shown, how it has been cared for, who has owned it, and when those changes occurred. Culture is not static. It unfolds over time through a series of events.
Yet cultural records are often fragmented. Provenance is spread across paper files, private systems, institutional archives, and personal memory. Dates may exist, but reliable ordering across different parties is often missing. This makes history easier to challenge and harder to trust.
When cultural assets are treated as fixed objects, their stories remain fragile. When they are treated as living histories, built from a clear sequence of events, their meaning becomes more durable.
From theory to practice
This perspective is not academic for me. It is the foundation of the work we are doing at ExhibitIQ. We approach cultural assets not as static inventory, but as evolving histories. The goal is not simply to catalog objects but to preserve the ordered sequence of events that give those objects meaning. Creation, exhibition, transfer, appraisal, conservation, and stewardship are treated as part of a continuous narrative, not disconnected data points.
By using decentralized systems to anchor order rather than opinion, we are working to ensure that cultural history remains coherent, verifiable, and resistant to quiet revision. Interpretation will always evolve. Context will always deepen. But sequence should remain intact.
In that sense, time is not something we look up. It is something we create together by agreeing on what happened next. For culture, where value depends on trust, continuity, and shared memory, that shift is essential. And it is the work ahead.
Read more from Brian R. Yurachek
Brian R. Yurachek, Founder & CEO of Parallel Worlds, Inc.
Brian R. Yurachek is a former 'Wall Street' asset manager and founder of Parallel Worlds, Inc., where he specializes in collecting unique IoT and digital twin data to deliver real-time insights that drive smarter decisions across physical and digital spaces. Beyond technology and business, Brian is also a multidisciplinary artist and passionate philanthropist, committed to using creativity and innovation to make a positive impact. His work bridges the worlds of data, culture, and community, inviting readers to explore the future at the intersection of technology and humanity.
.jpg)