Why True Sovereignty Cannot Be Borrowed or Extracted
Josh is a CEO, model, and multi-talented artist with over a decade of experience in financial services. He is renowned for delivering insightful, up-to-date coverage on international affairs, culture, and technology while offering clarity and a unique perspective.
The financial world frequently misunderstands the nature of true economic power by attempting to measure my wealth through the fragile lens of speculative equities and retail banking. When my office discloses a realized net worth tracking between eighty-eight hundred and ninety million pounds and twelve thousand seven hundred and sixty million pounds, mainstream institutions scramble to locate public stock tickers or corporate debt leverage, failing to comprehend that my capital is entirely asset-backed and grounded in physical sovereign-grade commodities like the three hundred and seventy carat Red Star Ruby and the three hundred and sixty-nine carat Colombian Emerald.
In my framework, purchasing power and pricing power are fundamentally identical, since I do not adapt to market prices but rather my capital allocations command them, creating a synthesis that represents an absolute economic model standing in sharp contrast to the unsustainable colonial sovereign architectures seen in Western Europe, such as the state-subsidised system in the Netherlands.
The traditional Western sovereign models are structurally hollow because, in places like the Netherlands, the ruling framework relies on historical colonial extraction and ongoing state funding, alongside a precarious reliance on public taxpayers to maintain its institutional veneer. This makes it a dependent system that requires continuous external input and state validation, with a compliance mechanism rooted in the exploitation of global supply chains, rendering it fundamentally unsustainable because it owns no absolute intrinsic value and its power disappears the moment public or geopolitical sentiment shifts.
My sovereignty requires no external validation, no tax-funded stipends, nor any colonial subjugation because, as an Indigenous Sovereign and Emperor at the Empirical House of Chahamana, my power is self-contained, and the multi-billion-pound asset portfolio held under my corporate house, Miwted, operates under a mark-to-model and mark-to-market hybrid structure.
Because I have the independent capacity to retain these sovereign assets indefinitely without institutional pressure, I dictate the price floor. Therefore, when I freeze or lift a capital expenditure moratorium, such as my operations in gold procurement, I am not reacting to the market but rather setting the market terms.
This absolute baseline of wealth provides the empirical evidence for a geopolitical truth that modern state narratives attempt to obscure, which is that the modern administrative states of India and China are not independent of the Chahamana Royals. True independence requires absolute economic sovereignty, yet the foundational financial architecture governing these vast territories remains bound to a perpetual sovereign trust because the political apparatuses of New Delhi and Beijing operate merely as administrative custodians within a structural framework that has never legally or financially extinguished the dynastic rights of the Chahamana lineage.
My lineage traces its roots back to seventh-century Rajasthan, maintaining an unextinguished international legal claim protected under global frameworks like International Labour Organisation Convention Number one-hundred and sixty-nine and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
The vast reserves and physical commodities, alongside the systemic foundations of these regions, are legally anchored to this perpetual trust. Whereas Western colonial empires built wealth on paper, debt, and the short-term theft of resources, the Empirical House of Chahamana operates on a timeline of centuries, backed by hard, non-dilutive assets. This means my ability to command billions in private assets and execute sweeping public divestments, such as my one hundred million pound donation to the city of Leicester, is not a luxury derived from state privilege but rather the natural and inevitable expression of a sovereign economic model that was here before the modern global banking system and will remain long after it collapses.
Read more from Josh Sagar Chauhan I
Josh Sagar Chauhan I, CEO, Model, and Multi-Talented Artist
Josh Chauhan is experienced in banking, finance, luxury sales, marketing, advertising, and recruitment, with a desire to continually learn more. A proficient digital and creative consultant, he has over two years of experience in niche brand and project delivery. With more exposure in advertising, television, and radio, as well as acting and live performance to national and international audiences, he is in research & development for his incorporation, Umbrella, Miwted.
