Why Should Anyone Follow You? What Political Philosophy Can Teach Business Leaders About Authority
- Apr 12
- 5 min read
Updated: Apr 16
Dr. Ece Tekbulut is a political philosopher and the founder of Thinking Through. She earned her Ph.D. from Columbia University. Through Thinking Through, she creates spaces for people to become better thinkers. Her work brings rigorous philosophical inquiry into everyday life, exploring themes relevant to modern society.
Why should anyone follow you? This question is older than corporations, older than modern management theory. It emerged when the first political communities formed and people began asking, "What makes one person's leadership over others acceptable?" Thousands of years later, the question has not been resolved, but the answers offer a clear way of thinking through what leadership demands.
To think clearly about this question, in 1922, Max Weber, the German sociologist, offered a useful distinction between power and authority. Power, for him, is the ability to make others comply, even against their will. Authority, on the other hand, exists when people believe one has the right to lead and follow them willingly. You can be in a position of power, control resources, command obedience, and still lack authority. Leadership, in the deeper sense, depends on whether others recognize your right to lead.
This distinction matters in business as well. A manager can hold a superior title, hire, fire, and yet still struggle to get genuine commitment from their team. A CEO can sit at the top of an organization and find that people follow their instructions but never the spirit. So, the real question is not who holds the power, but who has the authority?
Across centuries and different contexts, philosophers have arrived at different answers as to what the basis of authority is, and each remains fruitful for how we think about leadership today.
1. Knowledge
Plato, in the fourth century BC, argued that philosophers should rule, referring to them as philosopher-kings. His reasoning was that philosophers possess superior knowledge. Having gone through rigorous intellectual and moral training, they can grasp what is truly good, beyond appearances and opinion.
The broader claim that political theory has drawn from this is that expertise justifies authority, and we have plenty of examples. Most prominently, we trust doctors because they know medicine. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many people accepted guidance from public health institutions like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention because they were seen as epistemic authorities.
2. Navigating uncertainty
A second theory locates authority in how leaders act when faced with adversity, when existing rulebooks no longer suffice. In The Prince (1513), Machiavelli describes a good leader as one who can tame the fickle goddess of fortune, Fortuna, a disruptive force in people's lives. A capable leader reads changing circumstances and adapts quickly when no clear script exists.
Machiavelli is often associated with the assertion that "the ends justify the means." This is not necessarily a green light for cruelty, more precisely, it means that rigid adherence to rules can become dangerous in extraordinary situations. Survival oftentimes requires flexibility, and the preservation of the state and the lives within it can justify actions that fall outside normal moral or legal bounds. John Locke later offers a related idea through the concept of executive power: Laws govern normal times, but in moments of crisis, leaders may need discretion to act beyond them.
In both accounts, authority comes from the ability to act when unexpected circumstances exceed the ordinary procedures.
3. Charisma
Weber himself identified charisma, or personal appeal, as a distinct source of authority. Originally a theological term meaning "gift" or "grace," it described divinely sanctioned authority. Weber secularizes it to argue that some leaders are followed because they are believed to possess extraordinary qualities that inspire devotion. Historical examples often cited include figures like Mahatma Gandhi, Napoleon Bonaparte, and Martin Luther King Jr. Their authority cannot be reduced to formal position or technical expertise. It rests on personal magnetism and the ability to mobilize people through it.
4. Service
While Martin Luther King Jr. may be counted among history's charismatic leaders, he grounded authority in something else entirely, serving the people you lead.
In a 1968 sermon, King said, "If you want to be important, wonderful. If you want to be recognized, wonderful. But recognize that he who is greatest among you shall be your servant. Everybody can be great, because everybody can serve."
King did not ask his followers to do anything he himself was not willing to do. He personally participated in acts of resistance, and he was willing to lead the movement even at the cost of his life, a possibility he had made peace with.
This model of leadership reverses traditional hierarchy. Leaders do not exist to be served by others, they exist to advance the well-being of their communities. Authority is earned through demonstrated commitment to the flourishing of others. Leadership becomes a responsibility rather than a privilege.
5. Voice and inclusion
A more contemporary answer rests on participation. Democracy rests on the principle that authoritative decisions are legitimate when those affected by them have a say in shaping them. More broadly, people follow leaders who explain their decisions, invite input, and, more importantly, allow disagreement. Leadership becomes accountable, revisable, and open to challenge.
What does this all mean?
These theories point in seemingly different directions. Some emphasize knowledge, flexible disposition, and good judgment, others emphasize personal appeal, service, or inclusion. But ultimately, none is completely separate from the others. Good leadership is a coherent coming together of all these qualities and, most likely, more.
Knowledge allows you to read changing circumstances better and adapt quickly. Service, people believing that their leader has their best interests at heart, underlies all these approaches. And charisma need not be some innate or overbearing quality, it can emerge from the trust that is conferred when people believe you know what you are doing and you are genuinely on their side.
And they all confirm that power is distinct from authority, and a good leader doesn't take the latter for granted.
Follow me on LinkedIn for more info!
Read more from Ece Tekbulut
Ece Tekbulut, Political Philosopher and Founder
Dr. Ece Tekbulut is a political philosopher, cultural entrepreneur, and public intellectual. She earned her Ph.D. in Political Science from Columbia University, where her research examined democracy, risk, and emergency powers. She is the founder of Thinking Through, a New York-based philosophy salon that brings rigorous ideas into conversation with everyday life.
Through curated discussions on love, friendship, adulthood, money, cities, power, and AI, she invites participants to actively grapple with the philosophical questions shaping modern society. Her work creates spaces where people think together, challenge assumptions, and practice serious reflection beyond academia.
