Human Dynamics – The Invisible Force Shaping Project Success
- Brainz Magazine
- 7 minutes ago
- 5 min read
Danielle is the founder and principal of Archetype Learning Solutions, where she produces materials that support adult and organizational learning. She is also an author and academic researcher with an interest in how physicians transition from clinician to leader.
The missing piece in organizational understanding is basic human functions. Recently, I read a post about the Hawthorne Experiments and how the contemporary field of organizational behavior is beginning to question their validity. Sadly, my screen refreshed before I could read the entire article, but it left me with many thoughts.
The idea behind the OP’s SM post was that the community is beginning to question the methodology, validity, and findings, leading some to question if they have any merit in today’s organizational foundations. Regardless of how the field feels about the series of studies, I believe, it is a very moot point. If we focus entirely on the methodology, we lose sight of their significance. Human behavior plays a considerable role in understanding the nature of how today's workforce interacts with one another and our ability to meet strategic goals.
There were four major experiments commonly grouped under the Hawthorne Studies label. These were the first studies of their kind, examining how humans interact with each other and how those interactions affect productivity:
Illumination experiments (1924-1927): Examined lighting and productivity, famously showing that productivity increased simply because workers felt observed or "special". This is often what is referred to as “the Hawthorne Effect.”
Relay assembly test room experiments (1927-1932): Investigated how changes in work hours, breaks, and group dynamics impacted output.
Interviews (1928–1930): Mass interviews to understand worker attitudes and build rapport revealed the complexities of motivation.
Bank wiring room experiments (1931-1932): Focused on group norms, informal organization, and social pressures that included how people interact with one another, affecting productivity, independent of conditions or pay.
While the Hawthorne Studies have faced substantial criticism regarding their methodology and the interpretation of results, their historic influence on organizational theory and management practice remains profound. Many contemporary scholars argue that the precise strength of the “Hawthorne Effect” may have been overstated, or that confounding variables played a larger-than-acknowledged role. Nonetheless, the shift they triggered, from viewing workers purely as components of a production system to recognizing the importance of psychological, social, and group factors, revolutionized workplace management and laid the groundwork for the human relations movement.
One of the most important historical events was the movement away from idolizing machinery to understanding that humans did indeed play an important role in productivity and task completion. Further, technical skills alone are not enough, human dynamics are often the decisive factor in project outcomes. Connection, communication, trust, and kindness all have an impactful role in accomplishing work beyond the equipment.
Ongoing significance despite critique in project success
The studies made managers and scholars aware that employee attitude, morale, trust, and cohesion affect productivity just as much as external conditions or incentives.
Whether or not every experimental detail holds up, their legacy endures in the emphasis on listening to employees, valuing social processes, and adopting a systemic view of organizations.
The debates about methodology themselves have inspired more nuanced, employee-centered research in organizational psychology and management practices.
I believe the other important missing piece can be extrapolated from quantum theory and the observer effect. In the classic double-slit experiment, tiny things like particles such as electrons or photons create an interference pattern, a pattern of alternating light and dark bands, when not observed, demonstrating their wave-like nature. However, if a detector is used to observe which slit a particle passes through, the interference pattern disappears, instead, the particles behave like classical particles, not waves. It is the mere act of observation that fundamentally changes the experiment's outcome, a phenomenon referred to as the “observer effect” or the Hawthorne Effect.
Drawing the parallel: The Hawthorne effect
Similarly, the Hawthorne Effect describes how workers’ behaviors improve simply because they know they are being observed or studied, not because of any particular change in their environment. Just as particles in the quantum experiment alter their behavior under observation, so do people in workplace settings, leading to different outcomes than if they were unobserved. This highlights a fundamental human (and perhaps universal) tendency, awareness of observation changes behavior, whether on a quantum scale or in organizational life.Over many years of studying human dynamics in the workplace, I would also add that ego plays an important role in the Hawthorne Effect. That is, certain individuals receiving specialized praise within the workplace can tend to feel that they are not required to extend additional human courtesies because of their special status.
Before we cast out the findings because some scholars question the research methods, let's not forget the importance of this research and how it has fundamentally shaped our understanding of organizational dynamics:
The power of human dynamics
Behavioral science reveals how team psychology, motivation, and communication drive collaboration and productivity.
Core elements of human dynamics
Team dynamics: leveraging individual strengths and natural leaders.
Communication: both verbal and non-verbal, crucial for clarity and conflict resolution.
Motivation: understanding individual drivers and creating engaging environments.
Culture: building trust, mutual respect, and a sense of belonging
Leadership’s role
Adapting leadership styles to team needs.
Recognizing and addressing resistance to change empathetically
Fostering psychological safety and inclusion.
Practical tools and techniques
Use behavioral assessments to inform team composition.
Regular check-ins and feedback sessions to surface and address issues early.
Ultimately, while it is healthy to scrutinize historical research methods, the conceptual breakthroughs of the Hawthorne Studies continue to shape leadership development, employee engagement models, and approaches to workplace culture.
Conclusion
Understanding human behavior in the workplace is a greater fundamental need now more than ever. As more people, generations, ethnicities, and cultures enter the workplace, it's more important than ever for managers to be mindful of these impacts on the work. It's not just the machine, but the human as well.
With that, greater insight into human behavior can profoundly improve organizational performance, morale, and adaptability. When leaders appreciate that observation, acknowledgment, and the social context powerfully influence motivation (just as those tiny things like photons respond to being observed), it changes their approach to management for the better. Understanding that people, like photons or electrons, are shaped by context and attention makes for more compassionate, effective, and innovative workplaces.
Read more from Danielle Lord, PhD
Danielle Lord, PhD, Author, Researcher, and Content Creator
Dr. Danielle Lord is passionate about ensuring that employees have a meaningful and beneficial work experience. For over 30 years, she has worked in organizations bringing about transformational change through adult and organizational learning, change management, employee engagement, and leadership development. As the principal of Archetype Learning Solutions, she researches and develops materials to support employees and leaders in creating a harmonious work environment. In addition, many of her products are used by coaches and other consultants to help support their own practice of maximizing the human experience at work.
