Case Study – The Making of the Joker as an Abnormal Psychology Profile
- Brainz Magazine
- Nov 3
- 4 min read
Written by Lindsey Leavitt, Transformational Coach
Lindsey Leavitt is a transformational coach. Her expertise stems from her lived experience of abuse, mental illness, and chronic pain. Lindsey's transformation has inspired her to utilize her knowledge and abilities as an artist/musician to advocate, empower, and lift others.
Arthur Fleck’s transformation into the Joker is more than a villain origin story. It is a clinical profile of what happens when trauma, social neglect, and systemic labeling converge. Through psychology, sociology, and criminology, this article exposes how deviance is often manufactured, not discovered.
Subject overview
Name: Arthur Fleck
Alias: Joker
Context: Gotham City, late-stage social decay
Clinical focus: Development of deviance through abnormal psychology, scapegoating, and systemic neglect
Arthur Fleck’s transformation into the Joker is not random. It is a clinical map of what happens when unresolved trauma, systemic failure, and social projection converge. His case provides a rare window into how abnormal psychology manifests, not in theory, but in lived, catastrophic reality.
Symptom presentation: The disorder of laughter
Observation: Uncontrollable, inappropriate laughter in high-stress or socially incongruent situations.
Clinical Term: Pseudobulbar Affect.
A neurological condition in which emotional expression (crying, laughing) is detached from emotional state.
Often linked to trauma and nervous system dysregulation.
Functional Impact:
Social alienation.
Misinterpretation as instability, weakness, or threat.
Escalation of scapegoating and ridicule.
In Arthur’s world, his laughter becomes more than a symptom. It becomes evidence. The city reads it not as trauma but as defect. Every convulsion of laughter seals the accusation: He is broken.
Family dynamics: The burden of projection
Observation: Maternal dependency, distorted narratives about his father, history of concealed abuse.
Psychological Concept: Projective Identification.
Family systems protect their fragile image by disowning intolerable truths and placing them onto one member.
The scapegoat becomes the vessel for the family’s unresolved shame and dysfunction.
Impact: Arthur does not only carry his mother’s delusions. He becomes the container for them. Her failure to face reality becomes his lifelong burden.
This dynamic mirrors thousands of family scapegoat cases: the child chosen not for what they’ve done, but for what the system cannot bear to face.
Social context: The loop of entrapment
Observation: Arthur is ridiculed by strangers, cut off from medication, dismissed by institutions, mocked on public television.
Psychological Concept: Circular Causality.
A feedback loop in which every response confirms the accusation.
Speak up → “difficult.”
Stay silent → “cold.”
Cry → “unstable.”
Laugh → “insane.”
Impact: Arthur becomes trapped in a self-reinforcing cycle. Every attempt at adaptation strengthens the stigma. In criminology, this is called secondary deviance: once labeled, the individual is pushed further toward fulfilling the role society has scripted.
Identity collapse: From Arthur to Joker
Observation: Dissolution of personal identity; emergence of Joker persona.
Psychological Concept: Identity Foreclosure.
Identity prematurely sealed by imposed labels, leaving no room for self-determination.
The scapegoated role hardens into the only available self.
Impact: Arthur does not “become” Joker out of choice. Joker is the identity society leaves him. It is not a mask he chooses; it is the face the system paints for him until he can no longer peel it away.
Shadow manifestation: The return of the repressed
Observation: Sudden eruption of shadow self; collapse of social order around him.
Psychological Concept: The Return of the Repressed.
Traumatic content that has been buried resurfaces with intensity.
What society suppresses eventually returns through the one chosen to carry it.
Impact: Joker’s emergence is Gotham’s shadow made flesh. His violence is not simply individual pathology; it is collective repression detonating in one man’s body.
Criminological lens: The manufactured deviant
Traditional criminology would label Joker deviant, pathological, criminally insane. But a deeper lens reveals this: deviance was not discovered in Arthur. It was manufactured through systemic design.
Labeling Theory (Sociology):
Once an individual is marked as deviant, they are treated in ways that isolate and alienate them.
The treatment produces the very behaviors that confirm the label.
Arthur was not “found” guilty of madness. He was written guilty. His descent is not anomaly. It is prophecy fulfilled by the system itself.
Case conclusion: The mirror we fear
Arthur Fleck’s case demonstrates how scapegoating and neglect generate what we later call “monsters.” The Joker is not a spontaneous aberration. He is the predictable product of:
Neurological trauma was misinterpreted as a defect.
Family projection that scapegoated him as the problem.
Social ridicule trapped him in circular causality.
Institutional neglect that erased his access to care.
Systemic labeling that manufactured his deviance.
The Joker is not merely a criminal mind. He is a case study in how systems create the very shadows they fear most.
Reflection
How many “Jokers” are silently being created in families where one child carries the shadow?
How many are engineered by institutions that cut care, stigmatize difference, and punish survival symptoms?
How much of what we call abnormal psychology is individual disorder, and how much is social design?
The Joker is not only a villain. He is evidence. A living diagnosis. A mirror held up to every system that manufactures madness and then condemns it.
Read more from Lindsey Leavitt
Lindsey Leavitt, Transformational Coach
Lindsey Leavitt is a transformational coach. She is certified in Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT). The model focuses on emotional regulation, distress tolerance, and mindfulness. Lindsey battled with anxiety and depression throughout her life. She implemented various therapeutic modalities, but none were effective. Finally, Lindsey implemented the DBT approach, which changed her life forever. Now she is helping others take back their power, regain control of their lives, and start living an abundant life.
